morning to morning radio 24 has been the guarantor of the authorities interviewed the Minister of Privacy Rodotà that clearly says
"The authority has since 1997 indicating that the unauthorized wiretapping is a violation of privacy"
So it follows that the guarantor of rights shows that only those authorized by the judiciary does not violate the rights of citizens.
BUT THE PROBLEM IN DISCUSSION AND 'THIS !!!!!!
Let me explain ... .. we would kill two birds with one stone!!
In the sense that if the wiretaps violate the agreed rules and therefore the rights of citizens. ... It's OK by then the damage is done and then let us use them to justice.
OKAY??
I think not .... You can not step on the right. ... To do justice, or whether officials Telecom suspects by accident put him under arrest a few corrupt .... What are they .... Benefactors!! in the end we should give a medal for valor civil.
But it does not hold up under even the appearance of justice ... I do justice having used instruments do not conform to it ... .. it seems to me that in our law courts do not judge things not in accordance with the law (against it).
Example:
Two people make an agreement to renovate a house. ... But the company does work illegally without a permit to build. ... The owner does not pay the company ... (does not matter why he refusal), then the company takes the owner to court to enforce its claim ... ... even in the presence of contract between parts and invoices.
The court considers the facts ?????????
No, because contrary to law. ... The company was not even begin work. ... (A good judge sends the case to the offices responsible for the demolition work without authorization) to whether they would comply with the law because would not have occurred ....
BUT IN PARTICULAR THE CONCEPT 'THAT BELIEVES THAT THE LAW DOES NOT' THAT CONTRARY TO IT.
So the government's decision to destroy the unauthorized wiretapping is wise and consistent with the rights of citizens ..
Personal freedom is inviolable !!!!!!!! to stop a few rogues can not fail to laws or principles. ... especially when it comes to individual freedom ... .. must be an investigation to establish the evidence of the guilt of the people. ... fail in this is to put more into question the principles to our advantage often personal interpretations of the second magistrate. ...
During the Tangentopoli ... I did not agree with the actions of Di Pietro that put the suspects in jail and throw away the key until it confessed. ... Acted as the S. Inquisition in 700 !!!!!
no matter whether Italy was running where he was fishing and fishing in 90% of the wax wheeling ... ... but the 10% who was the victim of abuse and has been seen to limit his personal freedom ... .. when they committed suicide in jail !!!!! THAN WHAT WE SAY SORRY LORD !!!!!
NEVER BE LESS RIGHTS PRINCIPLES OR EVEN when those subjected to it 'the other side .... THE RESTORATION OF THE RIGHT AFTER A LONG TIME AND MINOR RIGHTS MEANS LESS FREEDOM'.
Insights:
tapping, the decree remains even if Peter insists
Who ran, and he knew he used the Spioni SpA in Telecom?
Scandal spies, Amato: "Understanding what has been infected SISMI"
tapping, Prodi Di Pietro "No hypothesis of change"
De Benedetti: "Telecom nice company to be distinguished by the directors'
Privacy
General 
0 comments:
Post a Comment